<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwizguide.com/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>snowboard community forums : Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff</title>
  <link>http://www.trusnow.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; snowboard community forums : Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff : Last 10 Posts</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 10:02:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.54</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.trusnow.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=1</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff : Signal OG vs Omni</title>
   <link>http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53874&amp;PID=1243166#1243166</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=370495" rel="nofollow">Dalton180</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Signal OG vs Omni<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May/11/2013 at 10:02am<br /><br />Anyone has tried Signal Boards can recomend me which one to take ?&nbsp; I want an all mountain board, but lightweight and which can be good to improve my Freestyle riding. Today i have a great board, Lib TR Pro but s too stiff and on the heavy side. I know that for many might be a damm board but for me it s not that wow .... <DIV>I ride all mountain and backcoutnry but want to start dedicating time to the park to dial in big 180s and 3s... Same as flat tricks</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Last but not least, anyone has tried the OG Signal, FLAT and Reverse ?&nbsp; which one is better for the park and powder ?&nbsp; FLAT right ? much difference on the groomers ? </DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>thanks for your advice...please recomend other boards too</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 10:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53874&amp;PID=1243166#1243166</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff : Off season practice</title>
   <link>http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53631&amp;PID=1242229#1242229</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=330167" rel="nofollow">MustacheGeorge</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Off season practice<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May/01/2013 at 8:51am<br /><br />You can do a lot of Core Strengh Training in the off season as well as buying a balance board. Another great trick for learning how to get on the rails is to grab a baseball bat or just a 2x4 and practice ollie'n on and off in 50/50's and board slides.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 08:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53631&amp;PID=1242229#1242229</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff : Board size choice</title>
   <link>http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53747&amp;PID=1236826#1236826</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=366602" rel="nofollow">kyk</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Board size choice<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> Mar/19/2013 at 12:12am<br /><br />Thanks a lot for your advice. <img src="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0" align="middle" /> <br /><br />I agree there isn't a big difference in sizes and flex between both boards. Finally I'm going to take the 156 to obtain a little more stability in the jumps and float in powder  <img src="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/smileys/smiley4.gif" border="0" align="middle" />. <br /><br />All the best,<br /><br />Kyk<br />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53747&amp;PID=1236826#1236826</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff : Board size choice</title>
   <link>http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53747&amp;PID=1236376#1236376</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=163621" rel="nofollow">ippollite</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Board size choice<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> Mar/16/2013 at 2:17am<br /><br />Both sound fine for your weight. Youre in the right area. Up to you of course on size ultimately, theres a bazillion factors going into it not the least of which is what yorue happy and used to riding.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>The real question you need to ask yourself to answer your question is what youre willing to trade off. Shorter = less float and less stability. Longer = more swingweight. In truth since there isnt much of a difference in the sizes and since you can fit them both easy enough its not THAT big a deal, but if you want to FOCUS towards buttering and spinning, you probably want to go shorter. If instead you just want to do it all, stick around the 156 area. As i say, its fine tuning and the effects wont be HUGE, particularly since theyre both alright sizes. So really its more a case of looking at what the boards bring to your game.&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 02:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53747&amp;PID=1236376#1236376</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff : Board size choice</title>
   <link>http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53747&amp;PID=1236228#1236228</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=366602" rel="nofollow">kyk</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Board size choice<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> Mar/15/2013 at 7:51am<br /><br />Hi guys,<br /><br />I'm thinking in renewing my snowboard and I've found two boards with good prices:<br /><br />2012/2013 Burton Antler 154.5 <br />2012/2013 Burton Custom Flying V 156<br /><br />I consider myself an all-mountain snowboarder but oriented to freestyle specialy butter, jumps and sometimes boxes and rails. I enjoy downhill playing with all the stuff there is in my way. <img src="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0" align="middle" /><br /><br />Currently, I ride a 2009 Burton Jeremy Jones 156 board. I am 5'10'' tall and my weight is 167-169 lb.<br /><br />Does anyone advise me about which of those boards fits better with my preferences? I think the Antler is softer than the Custom one and probably is easier to butter. Are these sizes ok for my weight?<br /><br />Thank you very much in advance.<br /><br />Kyk<br /><br /> <img src="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0" align="middle" /> ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53747&amp;PID=1236228#1236228</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff : What size board do I want</title>
   <link>http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53629&amp;PID=1232209#1232209</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=25" rel="nofollow">gsrrr</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> What size board do I want<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> Feb/19/2013 at 8:01pm<br /><br />Like ippy said, you can go with either the 156 or 159, depends on if you want high speed stability or something shorter so you can throw it around easier. &nbsp;<div><br></div><div>What sizes have your rented/been on before? &nbsp; If you were on something shorter than 156, I'd go with the Salomon in 156 as a 159 might be a relatively big jump in size. &nbsp;Otherwise, I'd suggest the 159.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><br></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53629&amp;PID=1232209#1232209</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff : What size board do I want</title>
   <link>http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53629&amp;PID=1232207#1232207</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=365071" rel="nofollow">Doplar</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> What size board do I want<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> Feb/19/2013 at 7:47pm<br /><br />I found this little chart from Salomon:<br /><br /> Sabotage + Classicks&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  156&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  250&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  125-165&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  7.5 - 10.5<br /> Sabotage + Classicks&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  159&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  251&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  145-195&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  7.5 - 11<br /> Sabotage + Classicks W&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  158&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  259&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  145-210&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  8 - 11.5<br /><br />I'm thinking I will go with the 159.  It sounds like this board will be just fine for me.  I was debating about going down to the the 156, but I'd already be over the ideal weight, and if a chunk on some lbs over the next couple of years, ... lol well I don't even know if it will effect the board much.  Ideally I want to be around 175lbs anyway.  <br /><br />The board is a freestyle board in general so I think I will be fine as I move from just downhill to some jumps and the terrain park.  The only think that has kept me teetering back and forth on the size is, I swear all the demo videos I watch they are all on the 156.  Maybe they are just shorter guys with smaller feet.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<img src="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0" align="middle" /> <br /><br />Anyone wants to comment please feel free.  I will probably pull the trigger on my purchase in the next day or two.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53629&amp;PID=1232207#1232207</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff : Off season practice</title>
   <link>http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53631&amp;PID=1232152#1232152</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2" rel="nofollow">Guests</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Off season practice<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> Feb/19/2013 at 4:14pm<br /><br />I have now been on 5 trips snowboarding and have the basics down.  I really want to improve and feel more confident.  Is there any kind of practice available to directly improve boarding skills?  Living in Texas, I don't have snow or hills for that matter.  Thanks for any advice!!]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53631&amp;PID=1232152#1232152</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff : What size board do I want</title>
   <link>http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53629&amp;PID=1232144#1232144</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=163621" rel="nofollow">ippollite</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> What size board do I want<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> Feb/19/2013 at 3:46pm<br /><br />For your weight, all of those sizes are fine.<div><br></div><div>Its really now down to you to fine tune it with your own preferences, so heres the very basic:</div><div><br></div><div>1. The 159 versus 155.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>- 159 has longer effective edge which means more stability at speed or in more complex terrain (as you say, you like downhill). It will also be more weight appropriate which means more pop and energy throughout the board giving you a more lively and fun ride. It also means more float in deeper snow.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>- 155 is easier to spin around, it will be more dead which isnt a bad thing, it means its pliable and has faster&nbsp;maneuverability. Its going to be easier to butter and spin around. This is why people tend to size down. They want that swing weight cut down for faster spins and sizing down means youre at a weight slightly at the high end of the manufacturers suggested idea of its "flex". Obviously, the more weight you can put on your deck the easier itll be to bend it/load it. But the harder itll be to pop it. And pop gives the board a lot of its energy.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Le trade off.&nbsp;<img src="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/smileys/smiley1.gif" border="0" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /></div><div><br></div><div>Ideally, your weight kinda sticks you from 156-160 and you can push it from 153-163 id say if you really wanted (though in truth theres no real upper limit - you can just pick up a huge board if all youre doing is pointing it down a massive open chute all day and just want massive turns - if you can control it, no reason you cant get on a 180 if you like).</div><div><br></div><div>Truth is sizing isnt an exact science. Its a messy business involving previous experience, rider preference, type of riding, type of terrain you ride (if you ride pow all the live long day why size down?), and just all round ability. These are just ballpark considerations. But now you should be in at least a position to decide for yourself what youre maybe looking to pick up. All of those sizes will work for you, but maybe one sounds more like what youre after than the other. &nbsp;</div><div><span style="line-height: 1.4;"><br></span></div><div><span style="line-height: 1.4;">&nbsp;</span></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53629&amp;PID=1232144#1232144</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Snowboard Advice : Ask our Staff : What size board do I want</title>
   <link>http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53629&amp;PID=1232115#1232115</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.trusnow.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=365071" rel="nofollow">Doplar</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> What size board do I want<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> Feb/19/2013 at 1:29pm<br /><br />Hello snowboard community,<br /><br />I'm trying to figure out a good size snowboard for myself.  It doesn't seem as straight forward as buying skis.<br /><br />I'm interested in this board (mostly for the look):<br />Salomon Sabotage 2012-2013<br />http://skipro.com/index.php/sabotage-wide-23w.html?SID=cf775c3873f86e89f87b6941e08bbba6<br /><br />Is there a big diffeence in a board that is 155, 158, 159 size?  This board also comes in wide?  <br /><br />I've been snowboarding on rentals for the past 5 years, and would rate myself as intermediate, or weak intermediate.  I think rentals have taken me as far as I want to go with them.  And since I want to snowboard more, renting is not paying off.<br /><br />I'm 170lbs, 5'11", size 10 boot.  I'm 32 yr old.<br /><br />I mostly do downhill snowboarding, but as I get better I want to get into some of the terrain parks, jumps etc.  Nothing extreme.<br /><br />Thanks for any help anyone can provide.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.trusnow.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53629&amp;PID=1232115#1232115</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>