Stale Sandbech Triple Underflip 1260

Ballsy... but was this really necessary?

i just don't buy that these count as 1260s.  it's clearly a triple backflip 180 overall.  90 degree turn, 3 flips, and then the final 90 degrees.  most doubles actually look like they have the full spin in them, like two cork 5's, but not these.  anyway, ballsy and impressive either way, although i have to side with the "i'm already against the NEXT cork" movement.

I don't see what the big deal is......I was doing these 5 years ago

When I get older I wanna be just like him.... oh wait im already to old. Wha wha whaaaaa

Agreed I don't understand how this counts as a 1260???

Nonetheless this is another progression and a gutsy effort!!

Well, whatever it was it was still a nice trick to land!  

eh whatever, looks good either way 

looks just like a triple backflip 180 out,but the trick itself was still very technical to pull off,still looks good to watch should add a little more invert for more style.Until someone does a quad cork or invents a new trick,triples are just enough to still impressed event judges.

What's the diff between underflip and backflip?

Originally posted by Alkasquawlik Originally posted by robnezz23 What's the diff between underflip and backflip? It's in the way you rotate. Underflip is when you just kinda roll backwards off the lip of the jump, and a "traditional" backflip is when you rotate 90 degrees first, and then flip straight back.

and whats the difference between an underflip and a frontside rodeo then?

i for one and not gonna get critical on the technical aspects, i mean come on, he still killed it.